临床儿科杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7): 682-.doi: 10.3969 j.issn.1000-3606.2014.07.021

• 实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

流感嗜血杆菌生物膜形成对抗生素的耐药性变化

高雪1,尚小领2,乔海霞1,张彦霞1,张存晖3,张玉妥1   

  1. 河北北方学院1. 病原生物与免疫学研究所,2. 附属第一医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,3. 预防医学教研室(河北张家口 075000)
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-15 出版日期:2014-07-15 发布日期:2014-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 张玉妥 E-mail:yvtuozhang@ sina.com

Biofilms produced by Haemophilus influenzae in vitro and antibiotics sensitivity changes

GAO Xue1, SHANG Xiaoling2, QIAO Haixia1, ZHANG Yanxia1, ZHANG Cunhui1, ZHANG Yutuo1   

  1. 1. Institute of Pathogen Biology and Immunology; 2. Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery of the First Attached Hospital; 3. Life Science Research Centre, Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China
  • Received:2014-07-15 Online:2014-07-15 Published:2014-07-15

摘要: 目的 体外建立流感嗜血杆菌(Haemophilus influenzae)生物膜(BF),观察细菌形成BF 后对抗生素敏感性的变化。方法 从腺样体肥大患儿的离体腺样体组织中分离30 株流感嗜血杆菌,并以96 微孔板培养,采用结晶紫染色和扫描电镜(SEM)鉴定BF 形成;分别测定氨苄西林(AMP)、头孢曲松(CRO)、左氧沙星(LVFX)和阿奇霉素(AZM)4 种抗菌药物浮游菌的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)、最低杀菌浓度(MBC)以及生物膜菌最低生物膜清除浓度(MBEC)。结果 30 株流感嗜血杆菌体外都有不同程度BF 形成。当BF 形成后,不同抗生素的MBEC 较其MIC、MBC 增高程度大小不一,差异有统计学意义(MBEC/MBC:H=91.54,MBEC/MIC:H=87.91;P 均<0.001)。AMP 的MBEC 最高,可高达MBC 和MIC 的100 多倍;CRO 的MBEC 较MBC 和MIC 可增高数十倍,LVFX 和AZM 对BF 的MBEC 最接近于MBC 和MIC。结论 BF 形成后,流感嗜血杆菌耐药性增强;氟喹诺酮类LVFX 和大环内酯类AZM 对流感嗜血杆菌BF 作用相对良好。

Abstract: Objective To establish a biofilm (BF) models of Haemophilus influenza in vitro, and to observe the changes of antibiotic susceptibility after the BF fromation. Methods Thirty strains Haemophilus influenzae isolated from adenoids of children with adenoidal hypertrophy and cultured in a 96-well plate. The BF was identified by crystal violet staining and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) and the minimum biofilm bacteria biofilm clear concentration (MBEC) of ampicillin (AMP), ceftriaxone (CRO), levofloxacin (LVFX) and azithromycin (AZM) were individually detected. Result All of 30 strains of Haemophilus influenzae formed various BF. After BF is formed, the increase of MBEC for different antibiotics was inconsistent with the increase of MIC and MBC. The difference was statistically significant (MBEC/MBC, H=91.54; MBEC/MIC, H=87.91; all P<0.001). The MBEC of AMP was the highest, up to 100 times than the MBC and MIC. The MBEC of CRO was dozens of times than the MBC and MIC. The MBEC of LVFX and AZM were most close to those of MBC and MIC. Conclusion After the formation of BF, resistance to antibiotics of Haemophilus influenzae is enhaced. LVFX and AZM showed more favorable effect on Haemophilus infuenzae BF.